From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: OpenSolaris 64-bit possible regression
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 08:16:39 +0200
Message-ID: <4B403647.9070709@redhat.com>
References: <bfdeacfa0912310846u594ed9fbr1172673433bc5e72@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Mark Bidewell <mbidewel@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40485 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750928Ab0ACGQo (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 3 Jan 2010 01:16:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <bfdeacfa0912310846u594ed9fbr1172673433bc5e72@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/31/2009 06:46 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> I have been testing OpenSolaris using the latest qemu-kvm and the KVM
> modules shipped with the latest F-12 kernel.  When I attempt to load
> OpenSolaris 2009.06 live CD in 64-bit mode I get several complaints
> about illegal instruction followed by an infinite loop of attempts to
> enter maintenance mode.  This configuration worked under KVM-88 in
> F-11.  If I specify --no-kvm it works and if I force 32-bit kernel it
> works.
>
> Any suggestions on how to further debug?
>
>    

What exactly are the complaints?

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.