From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: john cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models.. Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:06:50 -0500 Message-ID: <4B42D6FA.3020201@redhat.com> References: <4B2F19CC.5020808@redhat.com> <20091224130521.GD4781@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM list , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, john.cooper@redhat.com To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15452 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750888Ab0AEGg4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:36:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091224130521.GD4781@amt.cnet> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 01:46:36AM -0500, john cooper wrote: >> + { >> + .name = "Opteron_G2", >> + .level = 5, >> + .vendor1 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_1, >> + .vendor2 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_2, >> + .vendor3 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_3, > > Silly question: why a CPU named "Opteron_G2" uses intel vendor id's? The feedback I had from AMD indicated using the Intel strings for a family 15 cpu resulted in the least amount of guest confusion. The upstream kvm64 model does similarly. Sorry for my late response here which was preempted by the intervening holiday. -john -- john.cooper@redhat.com