From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: New kvm-related qemu patch queue Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:30:12 -0600 Message-ID: <4B4B4404.9090304@codemonkey.ws> References: <4B49C1D3.1070308@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel , KVM list To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f187.google.com ([209.85.210.187]:41973 "EHLO mail-yx0-f187.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750920Ab0AKPaW (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:30:22 -0500 Received: by yxe17 with SMTP id 17so20353059yxe.33 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:30:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B49C1D3.1070308@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/10/2010 06:02 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > In order to improve qemu.git kvm integration quality wrt performance, > features, and reliability Marcelo and I will begin to maintain a patch > queue based on qemu.git containing kvm-related patches. We will > review and apply patches to this queue, test them using the same test > suite that is used for qemu-kvm.git, and regularly submit them for > inclusion in qemu.git, mimicking the relationship between kvm.git and > Linus' linux-2.6.git. Thanks for setting this up Avi! I just want to stress that everyone continue CC'ing qemu-devel on all KVM patches. Even if the patch is qemu-kvm specific for the moment, I think it's important for qemu-devel to be exposed to the refactoring work. It might be good to prefix qemu-kvm.git patches in some manner to make it clear which repository they belong to. Regards, Anthony Liguori