From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: New kvm-related qemu patch queue Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 14:51:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4B5307CE.3000706@redhat.com> References: <4B49C1D3.1070308@redhat.com> <4B4B4404.9090304@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel , KVM list To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39928 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751783Ab0AQMvc (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 07:51:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B4B4404.9090304@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/11/2010 05:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 01/10/2010 06:02 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> In order to improve qemu.git kvm integration quality wrt performance, >> features, and reliability Marcelo and I will begin to maintain a >> patch queue based on qemu.git containing kvm-related patches. We >> will review and apply patches to this queue, test them using the same >> test suite that is used for qemu-kvm.git, and regularly submit them >> for inclusion in qemu.git, mimicking the relationship between kvm.git >> and Linus' linux-2.6.git. > > Thanks for setting this up Avi! > > I just want to stress that everyone continue CC'ing qemu-devel on all > KVM patches. Even if the patch is qemu-kvm specific for the moment, I > think it's important for qemu-devel to be exposed to the refactoring > work. > > It might be good to prefix qemu-kvm.git patches in some manner to make > it clear which repository they belong to. [patch kvm] - qemu-kvm.git uq/master [patch qemu-kvm] - qemu-kvm.git master [patch kvm stable-0.12] - qemu-kvm uq/stable-0.12 etc. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function