From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Ensure the exit frequency to QEmu for coalesced MMIO
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:47:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B56D144.5030501@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201001201734.54129.sheng@linux.intel.com>
On 01/20/2010 11:34 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
>
>> I think we can even do this from the I/O thread, without stopping a
>> vcpu, since the colaesced mmio page is not tied to a vcpu but is a vm
>> property.
>>
> This one sounds better. But I've taken a look at the current userspace code:
>
>
>> #if defined(KVM_CAP_COALESCED_MMIO)
>> if (kvm_state->coalesced_mmio) {
>> struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_ring *ring =
>> (void *) run + kvm_state->coalesced_mmio * PAGE_SIZE;
>> while (ring->first != ring->last) {
>> cpu_physical_memory_rw(ring->coalesced_mmio[ring->first].phys_addr,
>> &ring->coalesced_mmio[ring->first].data[0],
>> ring->coalesced_mmio[ring->first].len, 1);
>> smp_wmb();
>> ring->first = (ring->first + 1) % KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_MAX;
>> }
>> }
>> #endif
>>
> No protection for ring->first and ring->last? Seems it can writing the same element pointed by
> ring->first twice, then skip one element at (ring->first + 1)...
>
ring->first is owned by userspace, while ring->last is owned by the
kernel, so no protection is necessary except for the memory barrier.
Can you elaborate on how it would fail?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 8:35 [PATCH] KVM: Ensure the exit frequency to QEmu for coalesced MMIO Sheng Yang
2010-01-20 8:38 ` Sheng Yang
2010-01-20 9:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-20 9:34 ` Sheng Yang
2010-01-20 9:47 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-01-20 9:57 ` Sheng Yang
2010-01-20 11:04 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B56D144.5030501@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox