From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:11:11 -0600 Message-ID: <4B5EE9EF.6030904@codemonkey.ws> References: <20100126064902.GD25779@x200.localdomain> <03EA8701-C607-4B87-A6C6-1DCD3E5DCAAC@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Wright , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.217.224]:52667 "EHLO mail-gx0-f224.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753164Ab0AZNLQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:11:16 -0500 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so5715155gxk.1 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:11:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <03EA8701-C607-4B87-A6C6-1DCD3E5DCAAC@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/26/2010 03:09 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 26.01.2010, at 07:49, Chris Wright wrote: > > >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> > KVM Hardware Inquiry Tool > Avi beat you to it ;-) See vmxcap in the tree. > One of the things I have on my todo list is a tool you can run on your machine that tells you which virtualization features it supports. Imaginary output of such a tool: > > -- > > KVM Supported: yes > NPT/EPT: yes > Device Assignment: no > > Expected Virtual CPU Speed: 95% > I would suggest exercising caution in making such a broad performance statement. It's never going to be that simple. Regards, Anthony Liguori