From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:15:31 +0200
Message-ID: <4B5EF903.1070508@redhat.com>
References: <20100126064902.GD25779@x200.localdomain> <03EA8701-C607-4B87-A6C6-1DCD3E5DCAAC@suse.de> <4B5EE9EF.6030904@codemonkey.ws> <197BDDDF-D808-4157-8270-42B72B99BE0D@suse.de> <4B5EED22.4080009@redhat.com> <4B5EF874.3080306@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33761 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753771Ab0AZOPi (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:15:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4B5EF874.3080306@codemonkey.ws>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 01/26/2010 04:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Me too, especially as the whole stack is involved, and qemu is the 
>> topmost part from our perspective (no doubt libvirt will want to 
>> integrate that functionality as well).
>
>
> I'm not sure I agree.  It would use no code from qemu and really 
> benefit in no way from being part of qemu.  I don't feel that strongly 
> about it though.
>

It would need to know which cpuid bits qemu supports.  Only qemu knows that.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function