From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:22:46 -0600
Message-ID: <4B5EFAB6.4080102@codemonkey.ws>
References: <20100126064902.GD25779@x200.localdomain> <03EA8701-C607-4B87-A6C6-1DCD3E5DCAAC@suse.de> <4B5EE9EF.6030904@codemonkey.ws> <197BDDDF-D808-4157-8270-42B72B99BE0D@suse.de> <4B5EED22.4080009@redhat.com> <4B5EF874.3080306@codemonkey.ws> <4B5EF903.1070508@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-yx0-f187.google.com ([209.85.210.187]:57663 "EHLO
	mail-yx0-f187.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754275Ab0AZOWv (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:22:51 -0500
Received: by yxe17 with SMTP id 17so3651659yxe.33
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:22:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B5EF903.1070508@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 01/26/2010 08:15 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 04:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Me too, especially as the whole stack is involved, and qemu is the 
>>> topmost part from our perspective (no doubt libvirt will want to 
>>> integrate that functionality as well).
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure I agree.  It would use no code from qemu and really 
>> benefit in no way from being part of qemu.  I don't feel that 
>> strongly about it though.
>>
>
> It would need to know which cpuid bits qemu supports.  Only qemu knows 
> that.

I'm not sure I understand why.  Can you elaborate?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori