From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Rework of guest debug state writing
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:41:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6AEAB8.3030509@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6AE1E6.9040805@siemens.com>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:33:50AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:29:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> So far we synchronized any dirty VCPU state back into the kernel before
>>>>> updating the guest debug state. This was a tribute to a deficit in x86
>>>>> kernels before 2.6.33. But as this is an arch-dependent issue, it is
>>>>> better handle in the x86 part of KVM and remove the writeback point for
>>>>> generic code.
>>>> Jan,
>>>>
>>>> This patch breaks migration.
>>> Can you elaborate what you did? I can't reproduce, and I do not see any
>>> conceptual issue (given that guest debugging conflicts with migration
>>> anyway).
>> kvm-autotest fails (migration only, install is ok, both Linux and Win
>> guests). Not sure why, perhaps the unconditional KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
>> corrupts state somehow?
>>
>> Tested with io thread enabled.
>
> That's this default-off thing, so... OK, confirmed, investigating.
>
Heisenbug: It first also popped up (in form of a frozen migration
target) after removing this patch, but now it's totally unreproducible,
whatever patch I apply or revert from my series. Base is current master.
I tend to think there is a hidden issue of iothread vs. migration,
unrelated to this patch.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-04 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-03 21:29 [PATCH 0/4] KVM pull request: Various fixes and cleanups Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Fix up misreported CPU features Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: Make vmport KVM-compatible Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Move and rename regs_modified Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 21:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Rework of guest debug state writing Jan Kiszka
2010-02-03 23:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 0:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 13:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 15:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 15:41 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-02-04 18:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 18:53 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 19:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-08 15:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 16:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 19:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-04 20:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 15:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-03 21:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] KVM pull request: Various fixes and cleanups Anthony Liguori
2010-02-03 21:54 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6AEAB8.3030509@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox