From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] kvm: Change kvm_iommu_map_pages to map large pages Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:22:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4B6EB08B.9090705@redhat.com> References: <1264678682-30655-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1264678682-30655-7-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <20100128222455.GA26274@amt.cnet> <20100129093233.GU17809@8bytes.org> <20100201141804.GD16236@amd.com> <20100201193017.GA27065@amt.cnet> <20100205110145.GZ16236@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Joerg Roedel , David Woodhouse , kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Joerg Roedel Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100205110145.GZ16236@amd.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 02/05/2010 01:01 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > >> Yes, addresses the concern. >> > Are there any further objections against this patchset? If not it would > be cool if you could give me some acks for the kvm specific parts of > this patchset. > There are two ways we can get the kvm bits in: - you publish a git tree excluding the kvm patches, I merge your tree, then apply the kvm specific patches. This is best for avoiding merge-time conflicts if I get other patches for the same area. - you push everything including the kvm bits. I'm fine with both, though prefer the former. If you choose the latter, ACK for the kvm patches. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function