From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Fix x86 emulator's fault propagations Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:57:05 +0200 Message-ID: <4B72E561.5090408@redhat.com> References: <20100210104541.e0f1fdd1.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov To: Takuya Yoshikawa Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24976 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754373Ab0BJQ5I (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:57:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100210104541.e0f1fdd1.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/10/2010 03:45 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > This patch set consists of macro replacements > and some fixes of fault handling in the x86 > emulator. > > > Suggested by Marcelo, I separated these two > works and tried to make it clear what effects > each patch will produce: if you think that > reordering something in this series makes your > maintainance easier, I am willing to do so. > > > My motivation: What I want to achive by this > work is to make the basic style of x86 emulator > better for the following developments. Actually > unless we handle the fault properly, our works > implementing each instruction's emulation may > end up with no effect. > Patches 2-8 look fine, but I'd like Gleb to review them as well. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function