From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, quintela@redhat.com,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: qemu-kvm: do not allow vcpu stop with in progress PIO
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:03:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B72E6EE.7060602@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B72E67A.4060201@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/10/2010 06:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> Hrm, trying to read the thread I'm still somewhat lost. What exactly do
>> you want to document?
>>
>>
>
> The problem: if KVM_RUN exits with KVM_EXIT_MMIO or KVM_EXIT_IO, then
> the internal state is inconsistent. The instruction is only half
> completed, and we need to reissue KVM_RUN to complete it.
>
> However, if we're migrating, then we don't want to execute any more
> guest code. Luckily, if you KVM_RUN with a pending signal, then the
> pending mmio or io will be completed, and then, if the pending signal
> is unmasked in kvm's signal mask, KVM_RUN will exit immediately.
>
> I would like to document the fact that the signal check happens
> between the mmio completion and guest entry, and the above sequence as
> a way to get consistent state after mmio.
>
I see. Yes, that works for PPC Book3S too. We check for signals on the
beginning of vcpu_run. I'm not sure about BookE though.
Either way - wouldn't it make more sense to just move the check to
generic code?
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-10 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-28 19:03 [patch 0/3] save/restore in-progress PIO Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-28 19:03 ` [patch 1/3] KVM: x86: add ioctls to get/set PIO state Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 19:16 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-04 21:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 21:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-04 22:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-04 22:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-08 22:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-09 6:38 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-09 18:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-09 20:58 ` qemu-kvm: do not allow vcpu stop with in progress PIO Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-10 7:02 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-10 16:40 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:52 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 17:01 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 17:03 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2010-02-10 17:08 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 17:07 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-10 17:08 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-13 18:10 ` KVM: add doc note about PIO/MMIO completion API Marcelo Tosatti
2010-02-14 8:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-17 9:22 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 13:24 ` qemu-kvm: do not allow vcpu stop with in progress PIO Avi Kivity
2010-01-28 19:03 ` [patch 2/3] uqmaster: save/restore pio state Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-28 19:03 ` [patch 3/3] uqmaster: save/restore PIO page Marcelo Tosatti
2010-01-28 20:24 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-01-28 21:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B72E6EE.7060602@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox