public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:39:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B77EF0D.4050303@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B77EC14.4000302@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3811 bytes --]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/14/2010 12:34 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> event_exit_inst_len is only used for event reinjection. Since event
>>>> intercepted here will not be reinjected why updating
>>>> event_exit_inst_len
>>>> is needed here?
>>>>        
>>> In guest debugging mode a #BP exception is always reported to user space
>>> to find out what caused it. If it was the guest itself, the exception is
>>> reinjected, on older kernels via KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG and since 2.6.33
>>> via KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS (the latter requires some qemu patch that I will
>>> post later).
>>>
>>> As we currently do not update event_exit_inst_len on #BP exits,
>>> reinjecting fails unless event_exit_inst_len happens to be 1 from some
>>> other exit.
>>>
>>>      
>> Hmm, how does it work on SVM then where we do not have
>> event_exit_inst_len so execution will resume on the same rip that caused
>> #BP after event reinjection?
>>
>>    
> 
> Note, newer AMDs do have such a field (nRIP, 0xC8).  We need to support
> older machines, though.
> 

Nice.

[ /me goes updating his manual - September 07... ]

Actually, emulation via single-stepping should work as only #DB clears
the TF on entry. So this draft may fly (nothing to test on at hand):

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 52f78dd..450c1e7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
 	struct nested_state nested;
 
 	bool nmi_singlestep;
+	bool bp_singlestep;
 };
 
 /* enable NPT for AMD64 and X86 with PAE */
@@ -244,6 +245,19 @@ static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr,
 	if (nested_svm_check_exception(svm, nr, has_error_code, error_code))
 		return;
 
+	if (nr == BP_VECTOR && vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP) {
+		/*
+		 * Temporarily disable BP interception so that the trap is
+		 * properly delivered to the guest (if we left it on, SVM
+		 * would push the wrong IP on the stack).
+		 * We single-step into theexception handler in order to
+		 * reenble interception ASAP.
+		 */
+		svm->vmcb->control.intercept_exceptions &= ~(1 << BP_VECTOR);
+		svm->bp_singlestep = true;
+		svm->vmcb->save.rflags |= (X86_EFLAGS_TF | X86_EFLAGS_RF);
+	}
+
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nr
 		| SVM_EVTINJ_VALID
 		| (has_error_code ? SVM_EVTINJ_VALID_ERR : 0)
@@ -1083,7 +1097,8 @@ static void update_db_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		    (KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP | KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP))
 			svm->vmcb->control.intercept_exceptions |=
 				1 << DB_VECTOR;
-		if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP)
+		if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP &&
+		    !svm->bp_singlestep)
 			svm->vmcb->control.intercept_exceptions |=
 				1 << BP_VECTOR;
 	} else
@@ -1214,7 +1229,7 @@ static int db_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 	if (!(svm->vcpu.guest_debug &
 	      (KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP | KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP)) &&
-		!svm->nmi_singlestep) {
+		!svm->nmi_singlestep && !svm->bp_singlestep) {
 		kvm_queue_exception(&svm->vcpu, DB_VECTOR);
 		return 1;
 	}
@@ -1227,6 +1242,14 @@ static int db_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 		update_db_intercept(&svm->vcpu);
 	}
 
+	if (svm->bp_singlestep) {
+		svm->bp_singlestep = false;
+		if (!(svm->vcpu.guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP))
+			svm->vmcb->save.rflags &=
+				~(X86_EFLAGS_TF | X86_EFLAGS_RF);
+		update_db_intercept(&svm->vcpu);
+	}
+
 	if (svm->vcpu.guest_debug &
 	    (KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP | KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP)){
 		kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;


But it requires a bit more work as I just realized that already
nmi_singlestep could cause spurious #DB reports to user space that may
propagate to the guest in the end.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-14 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-13  9:31 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14  7:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 10:26   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 10:34     ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 10:47       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 11:15         ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 11:39           ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 14:16             ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 16:38               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 16:44                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 17:06                   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15  6:48                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 14:45             ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 16:37               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 16:53                 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 17:06                   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 17:26                     ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 17:49                       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15 13:20                         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-15 13:30                           ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-15 14:25                             ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 11:11                             ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-17 11:13                               ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 11:24                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 12:39                                   ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 10:55                           ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 11:32                             ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 13:03                               ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-17 15:13                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-17 16:11                                   ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16 11:20                         ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-16 11:25                           ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 12:27       ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 12:39         ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-02-14 12:43           ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 12:47             ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 12:53               ` Gleb Natapov
2010-02-14 13:23               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-02-14 13:29                 ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B77EF0D.4050303@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox