From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:16:50 +0200
Message-ID: <4B7805D2.7070602@redhat.com>
References: <4B767160.4070609@web.de> <20100214075303.GF2511@redhat.com> <4B77CFD7.9080504@web.de> <20100214103445.GH2511@redhat.com> <4B77D4DE.3030602@web.de> <20100214111544.GJ2511@redhat.com> <4B77E0E2.7030704@web.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8151 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750738Ab0BNOQw (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:16:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4B77E0E2.7030704@web.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 02/14/2010 01:39 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> that will work for both VMX and SVM before applying patches that make
>> oly VMX work?
>>      
> VMX used to work, so my patch is actually a regression fix. I bet this
> was accidentally broken while cleaning up the interrupt handling of VMX.
>
>    

Care to post a test case?

I can't say we run the internal test suite at the moment, but it should 
really be integrated into autotest.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function