From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Update instruction length on intercepted BP Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:38:08 +0100 Message-ID: <4B7826F0.8060009@web.de> References: <4B767160.4070609@web.de> <20100214075303.GF2511@redhat.com> <4B77CFD7.9080504@web.de> <20100214103445.GH2511@redhat.com> <4B77D4DE.3030602@web.de> <20100214111544.GJ2511@redhat.com> <4B77E0E2.7030704@web.de> <4B7805D2.7070602@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFDAE35AB76B9BBAB4D41066E" Cc: Gleb Natapov , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:44493 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751665Ab0BNQiL (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:38:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B7805D2.7070602@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFDAE35AB76B9BBAB4D41066E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Avi Kivity wrote: > On 02/14/2010 01:39 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> that will work for both VMX and SVM before applying patches that make= >>> oly VMX work? >>> =20 >> VMX used to work, so my patch is actually a regression fix. I bet this= >> was accidentally broken while cleaning up the interrupt handling of VM= X. >> >> =20 >=20 > Care to post a test case? >=20 > I can't say we run the internal test suite at the moment, but it should= > really be integrated into autotest. >=20 I know this should have been done long before. I just haven't worked on autotest so far (a colleague did, though), so there is some reluctance to get wet feet. But maybe I find some rubber boots. Jan --------------enigFDAE35AB76B9BBAB4D41066E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkt4JvAACgkQitSsb3rl5xTUHQCfZhUwR97DEpWOAJM4GcJrXcDC xhgAoIDJ2MDjKL9XFiyzxYCsvRqRN5gC =Vrrl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFDAE35AB76B9BBAB4D41066E--