From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evan Ingram Subject: Re: windows server 2008 hyper-v on kvm Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:09:43 +0000 Message-ID: <4B799BF7.2040001@cariss.co.uk> References: <4B79742B.4070700@cariss.co.uk> <20100215183932.GE19478@redhat.com> <4B7999AA.7010606@cariss.co.uk> <201002151302.09700.iggy@theiggy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp4.34sp.com ([80.82.115.203]:55020 "EHLO smtp4.34sp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755797Ab0BOTJn (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:09:43 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.34sp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64153EA271C for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:09:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.34sp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.34sp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id boimL-CUH+KY for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:09:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp6.34sp.com (smtp6.34sp.com [80.82.115.205]) by smtp4.34sp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5217AEA272F for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:09:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.34sp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E175DD05E6 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:09:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp6.34sp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp6.34sp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3y1SMn9v+b3t for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:09:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.0.0.8] (82-69-11-102.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.11.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cariss.co.uk) by smtp6.34sp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268F9DD04F6 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:09:40 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <201002151302.09700.iggy@theiggy.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 15/02/2010 19:02, Brian Jackson wrote: > > So you want to run hyper-v guests inside of a kvm guest? So there would be 2 > levels of virtualization? It's called nested virtualization. It only currently > works with AMD cpus, and even then it's pretty slow unless you've got npt. > It's also not very well tested (last I heard the only thing that worked > reliably was kvm in kvm). > yeah. i wanted to run windows remote desktop services to serve some thin clients, but i wanted to run it on my kvm server. the desktop virtualisation requires hyper-v.