From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 16 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:45:32 -0600 Message-ID: <4B7AAF8C.1050809@codemonkey.ws> References: <20100216080412.GC15022@x200.localdomain> <694D9944-56F9-4F0A-82E9-514B6860EEC5@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Wright , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:56948 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753206Ab0BPOph (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:45:37 -0500 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so281324vws.19 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:45:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <694D9944-56F9-4F0A-82E9-514B6860EEC5@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/16/2010 04:36 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 16.02.2010, at 09:04, Chris Wright wrote: > > >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> > Stable policies. How do we assure everything that belongs to -stable actually goes to -stable? > For the most part, I try to be proactive about evaluating patches I commit for stable. Often times, my pushes to stable lag significantly behind my pushes to master. That's because I try to do much more significant testing for stable and I think most people don't actually test the stable branch, they rely on stable releases. That said, I'm always willing to take patches backported to stable (tagged with [STABLE]). Pull requests are also welcome but please post patches first. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Alex-- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >