From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 16 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:47:58 -0600 Message-ID: <4B7AB01E.8010407@codemonkey.ws> References: <20100216080412.GC15022@x200.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Arnd Bergmann To: Chris Wright Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:56711 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752758Ab0BPOsH (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:48:07 -0500 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so282381vws.19 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:48:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100216080412.GC15022@x200.localdomain> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/16/2010 02:04 AM, Chris Wright wrote: > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > I'm not sure we'll have the right audience for this discussion, but: - macvtap vs. raw; my understanding is that we can achieve roughly the same thing with macvtap as with raw, since macvtap doesn't have the same security considerations as raw, is this a better strategy? Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >