* KVM call agenda for Feb 16
@ 2010-02-16 8:04 Chris Wright
2010-02-16 10:36 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 14:47 ` Anthony Liguori
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wright @ 2010-02-16 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm; +Cc: qemu-devel
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 16
2010-02-16 8:04 KVM call agenda for Feb 16 Chris Wright
@ 2010-02-16 10:36 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 14:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-16 14:47 ` Anthony Liguori
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2010-02-16 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wright; +Cc: kvm, qemu-devel
On 16.02.2010, at 09:04, Chris Wright wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Stable policies. How do we assure everything that belongs to -stable actually goes to -stable?
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 16
2010-02-16 10:36 ` Alexander Graf
@ 2010-02-16 14:45 ` Anthony Liguori
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-02-16 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf; +Cc: Chris Wright, kvm, qemu-devel
On 02/16/2010 04:36 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 16.02.2010, at 09:04, Chris Wright wrote:
>
>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
> Stable policies. How do we assure everything that belongs to -stable actually goes to -stable?
>
For the most part, I try to be proactive about evaluating patches I
commit for stable. Often times, my pushes to stable lag significantly
behind my pushes to master. That's because I try to do much more
significant testing for stable and I think most people don't actually
test the stable branch, they rely on stable releases.
That said, I'm always willing to take patches backported to stable
(tagged with [STABLE]). Pull requests are also welcome but please post
patches first.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Alex--
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 16
2010-02-16 8:04 KVM call agenda for Feb 16 Chris Wright
2010-02-16 10:36 ` Alexander Graf
@ 2010-02-16 14:47 ` Anthony Liguori
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-02-16 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wright; +Cc: kvm, qemu-devel, Arnd Bergmann
On 02/16/2010 02:04 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
I'm not sure we'll have the right audience for this discussion, but:
- macvtap vs. raw; my understanding is that we can achieve roughly the
same thing with macvtap as with raw, since macvtap doesn't have the same
security considerations as raw, is this a better strategy?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-16 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-16 8:04 KVM call agenda for Feb 16 Chris Wright
2010-02-16 10:36 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 14:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-16 14:47 ` Anthony Liguori
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox