From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build fix for #define KVM_DEBUG Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:40:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4B7BD59B.9040506@siemens.com> References: <411a180c1002082240u520516fck3cb93372626c5a77@mail.gmail.com> <4B71387F.4000203@redhat.com> <411a180c1002090251p77cdfd1aga4b2c1842a232481@mail.gmail.com> <411a180c1002161841l619d44d7he7a4d07ef80dbd81@mail.gmail.com> <4B7BC8F5.2080903@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , KVM ML To: Tsuyoshi Ozawa Return-path: Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:16327 "EHLO goliath.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752747Ab0BQLkd (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:40:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B7BC8F5.2080903@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > On 02/17/2010 04:41 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: >>>> shadow_efer was renamed to efer, so this should be modified rather than deleted. >>>> >>> OK. The new patch uses efer instead of deleting shadow_efer >>> >> Excuse me, and what should I do next ? >> > > Copy Jan - he maintains kvm-kmod, and probably didn't see your patch. > Yes, I did. Proper subject prefixing can help a lot here... Could you please repost, avoiding that the patch is line-wrapped and giving it an up-to-date changelog? TIA, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux