From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm-kmod: Build fix for #define KVM_DEBUG
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:00:33 +0100
Message-ID: <4B7C3CD1.7090302@siemens.com>
References: <411a180c1002171015w435e073dgece0b2e42af8f88c@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, KVM ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Tsuyoshi Ozawa <ozawa@t-oza.net>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:18722 "EHLO
	goliath.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752923Ab0BQTA7 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:00:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <411a180c1002171015w435e073dgece0b2e42af8f88c@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
>>> Copy Jan - he maintains kvm-kmod, and probably didn't see your patch.
>>>
>> Yes, I did. Proper subject prefixing can help a lot here...
>>
> 
> I'm sorry for I forgot to prefix "kvm-kmod" and thank you for telling me this.
> I mind this from now.
> 
>> Could you please repost, avoiding that the patch is line-wrapped and
>> giving it an up-to-date changelog?
> 
> Yes, this new patch for the newest commit passed checkpatch.

Thanks, merged.
[And as your original changelog was even better, I included it as well.]

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux