public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:40:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7D4368.6020903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266493115-28386-2-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>

On 02/18/2010 01:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Use of kmap_atomic disables preemption but if we run in
> shadow-shadow mode the vmrun emulation executes kvm_set_cr3
> which might sleep or fault. So use kmap instead for
> nested_svm_map.
>
>
>
> -static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
> +static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr)
>   {
>   	struct page *page;
>
> @@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@ static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
>
>   	page = kmap_atomic_to_page(addr);
>
> -	kunmap_atomic(addr, idx);
> +	kunmap(addr);
>   	kvm_release_page_dirty(page);
>   }
>    

kunmap() takes a struct page *, not the virtual address (a consistent 
source of bugs).

kmap() is generally an unloved interface, it is slow and possibly 
deadlock prone, but it's better than sleeping in atomic context.  If you 
can hack your way around it, that is preferred.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-18 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-18 11:38 [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 13:40   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-02-18 16:16     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: SVM: Fix wrong interrupt injection in enable_irq_windows Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: SVM: Fix schedule-while-atomic on nested exception handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 13:52   ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:24     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: SVM: Sync all control registers on nested vmexit Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: SVM: Annotate nested_svm_map with might_sleep() Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: SVM: Fix nested msr intercept handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: SVM: Don't sync nested cr8 to lapic and back Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: SVM: Activate nested state only when guest state is complete Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:32   ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:29     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:51   ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:55     ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:30       ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: SVM: Remove newlines from nested trace points Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:33 ` [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 14:48   ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:54     ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:33       ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B7D4368.6020903@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox