From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: make get dirty log ioctl return the first dirty page's position
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:59:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B84EA63.8030405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B84E985.8000508@redhat.com>
On 02/24/2010 10:55 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/24/2010 10:43 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
>> Some weeks ago, OHMURA Kei revised the qemu-kvm's
>> dirty bitmap scan by accessing the bitmap as an
>> unsigned long array.
>>
>> By reviewing this work more, we notice that kernel
>> side is doing a similar thing to check the bitmap is
>> all clean or not.
>>
>> So I made a patch which makes the get dirty log ioctl
>> return the first dirty page position found by this check.
>>
>> Though my test is not enough to show the effect of this
>> patch, the fact that this patch has no bad effect to both
>> performance and implementation logic and we can skip some
>> extra memory accesses and comparisons in userspace seems
>> to be suggesting this patch is promising, right?
>
> Well, if 10% of the pages are dirty, the new ioctl will statistically
> return something within the first 20% of the slot, so we can skip 10%
> and have to do the next 90%. Given that we already walked the bitmap
> once in the kernel and the saving is only in userspace, the average
> saving in bitmap-walking is only 5%.
>
> The patch's greatest benefit is if all pages are clean (100% saved) or
> if just one page is dirty (50% saved) but that will be very rare. So
> I think the return-on-churn here is too low.
btw, one idea I had was to allocate the bitmap in userspace and let the
kernel set bits directly. This reduces the amount of unswappable memory
the kernel allocates and reduces copying.
A problem with this is that userspace cannot just clear the bits, since
the kernel has to write-protect the pages again. I don't know how we
can do this without copying the bitmap.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-24 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-24 8:43 [PATCH 0/1] KVM: make get dirty log ioctl return the first dirty page's position Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-02-24 8:45 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-02-24 8:55 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Avi Kivity
2010-02-24 8:59 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-02-24 9:20 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-02-24 9:42 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-24 9:45 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-02-24 10:03 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-24 10:09 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B84EA63.8030405@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox