From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: PCI Device Assignment without VT-d? Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:14:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4B84FC1C.6000900@redhat.com> References: <4B845A33.7010607@rdsoftware.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Erik Rull Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11787 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754042Ab0BXLHE (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:07:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B845A33.7010607@rdsoftware.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/24/2010 12:44 AM, Erik Rull wrote: > Hi all, > > I've "only" a core2duo with VT, is it somehow possible to use the PCI > device assignment without VT-d? > That would be great because I cannot upgrade the Mainboard for my system. Not really. There was some work to allow a single unmodified guest to be assigned PCI devices, and for multiple modified guests as well, but neither have been merged. Both exposed the host to a malicious guest. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function