From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] KVM: SVM: Optimize nested svm msrpm merging Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:58:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4B8584D5.8010303@redhat.com> References: <1267034360-5907-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1267034360-5907-12-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <402BABD5-304A-47EA-B35C-D0E3948BB27E@suse.de> <20100224193700.GE3168@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Graf , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Joerg Roedel Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100224193700.GE3168@amd.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 02/24/2010 09:37 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > >> Isn't there such a list around somewhere already? We really should >> only keep this list once throughout the whole code. If necessary, just >> create the list on the fly when bits get set in the msrpm. >> > No, the list is hardcoded in 3 functions (as parameter of > set_msr_interception). I think about a variant to do this with a single > list. Probably I create a list of MSRs and check in > set_msr_interceptionm for it. > > Or, have set_msr_interception() create the list of offsets. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.