From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Weidemann?= Subject: Re: Direct access to GPGPU do-able? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:03:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4B868327.80503@web.de> References: <200912010808.07998.carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de> <4B14D7C7.5010304@intel.com> <3b47c0dd0912011033l553ea3e1j42b98b74cf473564@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Fede To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:52158 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932357Ab0BYOD0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:03:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3b47c0dd0912011033l553ea3e1j42b98b74cf473564@mail.gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Federico, On 01.12.2009 19:33, Fede wrote: > I analyzed both XEN patches and determined where this patch must be > done in KVM. It's just a matter of writing the code. > > Currently I'm studying for some final exams, so I will take some time > off before I continue with this port. > > And because of hardware related problems, if it's not done in two or > three weeks, then it will be finished in february. Did you find some time to start working on the patches for KVM, so=20 graphic cards will be initialized properly inside VMs? Regards Andr=E9