From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: how to tweak kernel to get the best out of kvm? Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:00:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4B97C21F.4070400@redhat.com> References: <4B912156.5020707@darkharri.de> <4B94D947.3060303@redhat.com> <4B979776.1000701@aixigo.de> <4B979B81.5060508@redhat.com> <90eb1dc71003100757k6b649408s8170e2534d7360b6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Dunkel , Harald Dunkel , KVM Mailing List To: Javier Guerra Giraldez Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20477 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756814Ab0CJQAs (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:00:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <90eb1dc71003100757k6b649408s8170e2534d7360b6@mail.gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/10/2010 05:57 PM, Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> 15 guests should fit comfortably, more with ksm running if the workloads are >> similar, or if you use ballooning. >> > is there any simple way to get some stats to see how is ksm doing? > See /sys/kernel/mm/ksm -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function