From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:21:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4BA3260D.5090407@redhat.com> References: <20100316173940.GA23859@elte.hu> <4BA00F1F.1090907@codemonkey.ws> <20100317081041.GC16374@elte.hu> <4BA1E24B.6090904@redhat.com> <20100318085607.GB2157@elte.hu> <4BA1FC80.2000401@redhat.com> <20100318105013.GB24464@elte.hu> <4BA294D4.2060700@redhat.com> <20100318211529.GA21367@elte.hu> <4BA2A70B.5080101@redhat.com> <20100318224446.GC19669@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Zachary Amsden , Anthony Liguori , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , oerg Roedel , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , ziteng.huang@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Fr?d?ric Weisbecker To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100318224446.GC19669@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 03/19/2010 12:44 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Too bad - there was heavy initial opposition to the arch/x86 unification as > well [and heavy opposition to tools/perf/ as well], still both worked out > extremely well :-) > Did you forget that arch/x86 was a merging of a code fork that happened several years previously? Maybe that fork shouldn't have been done to begin with. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.