From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tokarev Subject: Re: Tracking KVM development Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:16:54 +0300 Message-ID: <4BA67EB6.1000806@msgid.tls.msk.ru> References: <1f0fa7ae1003210421x734e8c1bid1ad04c0f3c51885@mail.gmail.com> <4BA60FB5.5070609@redhat.com> <1f0fa7ae1003210937h62a1baa1q734692b9a11d30ef@mail.gmail.com> <4BA64C8C.3010908@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_L=F8cke?= , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([81.13.33.159]:44708 "EHLO isrv.corpit.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752105Ab0CUUQ4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:16:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BA64C8C.3010908@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: [] > The only kvm-specific distribution I know of is RHEV-H, but that's > probably not what you're looking for. I'm talking about distributions > that have an active kvm package maintainer, update the packages > regularly, have bug trackers that someone looks into, etc. At least > Fedora and Ubuntu do this, perhaps openSuSE as well (though the latter > has a stronger Xen emphasis). Debian is a lot better on this front than it used to be a year ago. At least I'm trying to look for the bugreports on a regular basis ;) /mjt