From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yoshiaki Tamura Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] qemu-kvm: Introduce wrapper functions to access phys_ram_dirty, and replace existing direct accesses to it. Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:33:35 +0900 Message-ID: <4BA7012F.4020402@lab.ntt.co.jp> References: <1268805108-27433-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20100318195912.GA14091@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: Received: from tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.148]:49856 "EHLO tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751135Ab0CVFd5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:33:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100318195912.GA14091@amt.cnet> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:51:46PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> >> Before replacing byte-based dirty bitmap with bit-based dirty bitmap, >> clearing direct accesses to the bitmap first seems to be good point to >> start with. >> >> This patch set is based on the following discussion. >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg30724.html >> >> Thanks, >> >> Yoshi > > Looks fine to me. > > This is qemu upstream material, though. Thanks for your comment. I should have removed qemu-kvm from the title. Should I rebase the patch to qemu.git and repost?