From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Chmielewski Subject: Re: Tracking KVM development Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:33:34 +0100 Message-ID: <4BA79BDE.4060206@wpkg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: Received: from mx03.syneticon.net ([78.111.66.105]:36711 "EHLO mx03.syneticon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755143Ab0CVQdr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:33:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (filter1.syneticon.net [192.168.113.83]) by mx03.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87EF3600C for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:33:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx03.syneticon.net ([192.168.113.84]) by localhost (mx03.syneticon.net [192.168.113.83]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 10fpkVkK-NmF for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:33:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.145] (f048224041.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.48.224.41]) by mx03.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:33:35 +0100 (CET) Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I've never heard of any KVM specific distributions. Are you aware of > any? Have you heard of Proxmox VE[1]? It's built on top of Debian with virtualization in mind. [1] http://pve.proxmox.com -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org