From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:32:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4BA7A9AF.3010806@redhat.com> References: <20100318172805.GB26067@elte.hu> <4BA3747F.60401@codemonkey.ws> <20100321191742.GD25922@elte.hu> <4BA67B2F.4030101@redhat.com> <20100321203121.GA30194@elte.hu> <20100322111040.GL13108@8bytes.org> <20100322122228.GH3483@elte.hu> <20100322134633.GD1940@8bytes.org> <20100322163215.GC18796@elte.hu> <84144f021003221027t1a3e7d6ft64612654c5e50da@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , Anthony Liguori , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , ziteng.huang@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Fr?d?ric Weisbecker To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: In-Reply-To: <84144f021003221027t1a3e7d6ft64612654c5e50da@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 03/22/2010 07:27 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > It's kinda funny to see people argue that having an external > repository is not a problem and that it's not a big deal if building > something from the repository is slightly painful as long as it > doesn't require a PhD when we have _real world_ experience that it > _does_ limit developer base in some cases. Whether or not that applies > to kvm remains to be seen but I've yet to see a convincing argument > why it doesn't. > qemu has non-Linux developers. Not all of their contributions are relevant to kvm but some are. If we pull qemu into tools/kvm, we lose them. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function