From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:29:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4BA7C4FF.3080407@codemonkey.ws> References: <20100322124428.GA12475@elte.hu> <4BA76810.4040609@redhat.com> <20100322143212.GE14201@elte.hu> <4BA7821C.7090900@codemonkey.ws> <20100322155505.GA18796@elte.hu> <4BA796DF.7090005@redhat.com> <20100322165107.GD18796@elte.hu> <4BA7A406.9050203@redhat.com> <20100322173400.GB15795@elte.hu> <4BA7B87A.8060104@codemonkey.ws> <20100322192259.GD21919@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Pekka Enberg , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , oerg Roedel , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , ziteng.huang@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Fr?d?ric Weisbecker , Gregory Haskins To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100322192259.GD21919@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 03/22/2010 02:22 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> Transitive had a product that was using a KVM context to run their >> binary translator which allowed them full access to the host >> processes virtual address space range. In this case, there is no >> kernel and there are no devices. >> > And your point is that such vcpus should be excluded from profiling just > because they fall outside the Qemu/libvirt umbrella? > You don't instrument it the way you'd instrument an operating system so no, you don't want it to show up in perf kvm top. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Ingo >