From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: VMX and save/restore guest in virtual-8086 mode
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:29:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBD85F1.50900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BBD8453.2030405@siemens.com>
On 04/08/2010 10:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 04/07/2010 11:24 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>>> During initialization, WinXP.32 switches to virtual-8086 mode, with
>>> paging enabled, to use VGABIOS functions.
>>>
>>> Since enter_pmode unconditionally clears IOPL and VM bits in RFLAGS
>>>
>>> flags = vmcs_readl(GUEST_RFLAGS);
>>> flags&= ~(X86_EFLAGS_IOPL | X86_EFLAGS_VM);
>>> flags |= (vmx->rmode.save_iopl<< IOPL_SHIFT);
>>> vmcs_writel(GUEST_RFLAGS, flags);
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Looks like KVM_SET_REGS should write rmode.save_iopl (and a new save_vm)?
>>
> Just like we manipulate the flags for guest debugging in the
> set/get_rflags vendor handlers, the same should happen for IOPL and VM.
> This is no business of enter_pmode/rmode.
>
This is vendor specific code, and it isn't manipulating guest values,
only host values (->set_rflags() is called when the guest value changes,
which isn't happening here). Of course some refactoring will be helpful
here.
>>> The following patch fixes it, but it has some drawbacks:
>>>
>>> - cpu_synchronize_state+writeback is noticeably slow with tpr patching,
>>> this makes it slower.
>>>
>>>
>> Isn't it a very rare event?
>>
> It has to be - otherwise the decision to go for full sync and individual
> get/set IOCTL would have been wrong. What happens during tpr patching?
>
>
tpr patching listens for instructions which access the tpr and patches
them to a call instruction (targeting some hacky code in the bios).
Since there are a limited number of such instructions (20-30 IIRC) you
expect tpr patching to happen very rarely.
>>> - Its a fugly workaround.
>>>
>>>
>> True.
>>
>>
> Still likely the way to go for old kernels.
>
>
It's a bugfix that can go into -stable and supported distribution kernels.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-08 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-07 20:24 VMX and save/restore guest in virtual-8086 mode Marcelo Tosatti
2010-04-07 20:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-08 7:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-08 7:29 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-04-08 7:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-08 8:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-08 14:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-04-08 14:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-08 14:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-08 14:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBD85F1.50900@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox