Re: Question on skip_emulated_instructions()

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 04/08/2010 04:42 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
>
>> Yes, you can release the I/O from the iothread instead of the vcpu thread.
>>   You can make virtio_net_handle_tx() disable virtio notifications and
>> initiate state sync and return, when state sync continues you can call the
>> original virtio_net_handle_tx().  If the secondary takes over, it needs to
>> call the original virtio_net_handle_tx() as well.
>>      
> Agreed.  Let me try it.
> Meanwhile, I'll post what I have done including the hack preventing
> rip to proceed.
> I would appreciate if you could comment on that too, to keep things in
> a good direction.
>    

Certainly.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function