From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takuya Yoshikawa Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/5] KVM: Use rapper functions to create and destroy dirty bitmaps Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:07:43 +0900 Message-ID: <4BC2806F.9010707@oss.ntt.co.jp> References: <20100409182732.857de4db.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <20100409183414.f1caa95c.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <4BC20342.9080800@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp ([222.151.198.100]:44388 "EHLO serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751184Ab0DLCEk (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:04:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BC20342.9080800@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: (2010/04/12 2:13), Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/09/2010 12:34 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: >> For x86, we will change the allocation and free parts to do_mmap() and >> do_munmap(). This patch makes it cleaner. >> > > Should be done for all architectures. I don't want different ways of > creating dirty bitmaps for different architectures. > OK. So the only difference for other(generic) implementation would be if we pin bitmaps or not.