Re: [PATCH RFC 5/5] KVM: This is the main part of the "moving dirty bitmaps to user space"

Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-12T02:26:07Z

(2010/04/12 2:21), Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/09/2010 12:38 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
>> By this patch, bitmap allocation is replaced with do_mmap() and
>> bitmap manipulation is replaced with *_user() functions.
>>
>> Note that this does not change the APIs between kernel and user space.
>> To get more advantage from this hack, we need to add a new interface
>> for triggering the bitmap swith and getting the bitmap addresses: the
>> addresses is in user space and we can export them to qemu.
>>
>
> I would like to merge the new API together with the patchset, since
> without it, the improvement is insufficient.

OK, it would be only a simple API functions.

>
>> TODO:
>> 1. We want to use copy_in_user() for 32bit case too.
>
> Definitely. Why doesn't it work now?

Sadly we don't have that for 32bit. We have to implement by ourselves.

I tested two temporary implementations for 32bit:
1. This version using copy_from_user() and copy_to_user() with
not nice vmalloc().
2. Loop with __get_user() and __put_user().

The result was 1 is much faster than 2.

>
>> Note that this is only for the compatibility issue: in the future,
>> we hope, qemu will not need to use this ioctl.
>> 2. We have to implement test_bit_user() to avoid extra set_bit.
>
> This was important in the days of shadow paging. I'm not so sure about
> it with nested paging, since we'll typically only fault a page once per
> iteration. Since we're very likely to actually write these days, the
> extra access is wasteful.

Nice news for me! So all we need to ask x86(asm-generic) people to merge are:

set bit user and copy_in_user 32bit version.

>
>>
>> +int kvm_arch_create_dirty_bitmap(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long user_addr1;
>> + unsigned long user_addr2;
>> + int dirty_bytes = kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(memslot);
>> +
>> + down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>> + user_addr1 = do_mmap(NULL, 0, dirty_bytes,
>> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>> + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0);
>> + if (IS_ERR((void *)user_addr1)) {
>> + up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>> + return PTR_ERR((void *)user_addr1);
>> + }
>> + user_addr2 = do_mmap(NULL, 0, dirty_bytes,
>> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>> + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0);
>> + if (IS_ERR((void *)user_addr2)) {
>> + do_munmap(current->mm, user_addr1, dirty_bytes);
>> + up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>> + return PTR_ERR((void *)user_addr2);
>> + }
>> + up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>
> I think a single do_mmap() call for both bitmaps is simpler in terms of
> error handling.

OK, I'll fix in the next version.

>