From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] KVM MMU: optimize for writing cr4
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:42:48 +0800
Message-ID: <4BC2F928.2060407@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <4BC2D2E2.1030604@cn.fujitsu.com> <4BC2D3E0.8070602@cn.fujitsu.com> <4BC2DB27.7060005@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4BC2DB27.7060005@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Hi Avi,

Thanks for your comments.

Avi Kivity wrote:

> Later we have:
> 
>>         kvm_x86_ops->set_cr4(vcpu, cr4);
>>         vcpu->arch.cr4 = cr4;
>>         vcpu->arch.mmu.base_role.cr4_pge = (cr4 & X86_CR4_PGE) &&
>> !tdp_enabled;
> 
> All of which depend on cr4.

Oh, destroy_kvm_mmu() is not really destroyed cr3 and we can reload it later
form shadow page cache, so, maybe this patch is unnecessary.

But, i have a another question here, why we need encode 'cr4 & X86_CR4_PGE' into
base_role.cr4_gpe? Why we need allocation different shadow page for global page
and no-global page?

As i know, global page is not static in TLB, and x86 cpu also may flush them form TLB,
maybe we no need treat global page specially... Am i miss something? :-(

Xiao