From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: move DR register access handling into generic code.
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:54:22 +0300
Message-ID: <4BC3341E.2050108@redhat.com>
References: <20100412122712.GC23554@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, mtosatti@redhat.com
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15602 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750995Ab0DLOy2 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:54:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20100412122712.GC23554@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 04/12/2010 03:27 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Currently both SVM and VMX have their own DR handling code. Move it to
> x86.c.
>
>    

The standard process is to make them identical first and finally merge 
identical code, but I guess we can skip it in this case (Jan?)


-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.