From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM MMU: optimize/cleanup for marking parent unsync
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:58:27 +0300
Message-ID: <4BC45C63.2010307@redhat.com>
References: <4BC2D2E2.1030604@cn.fujitsu.com> <4BC2D390.7050708@cn.fujitsu.com> <20100412171211.GC4976@amt.cnet> <4BC3CE83.8020705@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4BC3CE83.8020705@cn.fujitsu.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 04/13/2010 04:53 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>> I'd prefer to not touch it.
>>      
> This patch avoids walk all parents and i think this overload is really unnecessary.
> It has other tricks in this codepath but i not noticed? :-)
>    

There is also the advantage of code size reduction.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function