From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:17:18 +0300 Message-ID: <4BC5A43E.1090906@redhat.com> References: <1902387910.2078.435.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> <4BC588CF.5010507@redhat.com> <20100414104338.GA31348@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , oerg Roedel , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , zhiteng.huang@intel.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11122 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754828Ab0DNLRi (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:17:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100414104338.GA31348@elte.hu> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/14/2010 01:43 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> Thanks for persisting despite the flames. >> >> Can you please separate arch/x86/kvm part of the patch? That will make for >> easier reviewing, and will need to go through separate trees. >> > Once it gets into a state that it can be applied could you please create a > separate, -git based branch for it, so that i can pull it for testing and > integration with the tools/perf/ bits? > > Sure. > Assuming there are no serious conflicts with pending KVM work. > There will be a conflict with the NMI fix (which has to go in first, we'll want to backport it), I'll put it on the same branch. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function