From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:16:58 +0300 Message-ID: <4BCA092A.8050308@redhat.com> References: <1271403275.2078.509.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> <4BC9FC9A.6050807@redhat.com> <20100417191308.GA25160@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , Marcelo Tosatti , oerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jes Sorensen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zachary Amsden , Gleb Natapov , tim.c.chen@intel.com, zhiteng.huang@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100417191308.GA25160@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 04/17/2010 10:13 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Avi Kivity wrote: > > >> On 04/16/2010 10:34 AM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: >> >>> Below is the kernel patch to enable perf to collect guest os statistics. >>> >>> Joerg, >>> >>> Would you like to add support on svm? I don't know the exact point to trigger >>> NMI to host with svm. >>> >>> See below code with vmx: >>> >>> + kvm_before_handle_nmi(&vmx->vcpu); >>> asm("int $2"); >>> + kvm_after_handle_nmi(&vmx->vcpu); >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin >>> >> Can you please split it further? >> >> Patch 1 introduces perf_register_guest_info_callbacks() and related. Ingo >> can merge this into a branch in tip.git. Patch 2 is just the kvm bits, I'll >> apply that after merging the branch with patch 1. Patch 3 adds the >> tools/perf changes. >> >> This way perf development can continue on tip.git, and kvm development can >> continue on kvm.git, without the code bases diverging and requiring a merge >> later. >> > I'd like to pull the KVM bits from you into perf - so that there's a testable > form of the changes. We can do that via a branch that has 1-2 changes, plus > minimal conflicts down the line, right? > We can try doing this (currently we don't, but this is simple enough that we could). I'd still like 1-2 in two patches. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.