From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:25:17 +0300 Message-ID: <4BCC136D.503@redhat.com> References: <1902387910.2078.435.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> <20100415104051.GC12697@8bytes.org> <4BC6EDFF.3000702@redhat.com> <201004152208.08409.sheng@linux.intel.com> <4BC9FA19.2070602@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joerg Roedel , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , zhiteng.huang@intel.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Sheng Yang Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49405 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751535Ab0DSIZk (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 04:25:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BC9FA19.2070602@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/17/2010 09:12 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > I think you were right the first time around. > Re-reading again (esp. the part about treatment of indirect NMI vmexits), I think this was wrong, and that the code is correct. I am now thoroughly confused. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function