From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:18:14 -0700 Message-ID: <4BCC8246.9040202@goop.org> References: <1271356648-5108-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1271356648-5108-2-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <4BC8CA52.4090703@goop.org> <1271673545.1674.743.camel@laptop> <4BCC3584.1050501@redhat.com> <1271675100.1674.818.camel@laptop> <4BCC3A3E.9070909@redhat.com> <20100419142158.GD14158@mothafucka.localdomain> <4BCC69D5.3050209@redhat.com> <1271688411.1488.248.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Glauber Costa , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Zachary Amsden To: Peter Zijlstra Return-path: Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:39128 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754949Ab0DSQSP (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:18:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1271688411.1488.248.camel@laptop> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/19/2010 07:46 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > What avi says! :-) > > On a 32bit machine a 64bit read are two 32bit reads, so > > last = last_value; > > becomes: > > last.high = last_value.high; > last.low = last_vlue.low; > > (or the reverse of course) > > Now imagine a write getting interleaved with that ;-) > You could explicitly do: do { h = last.high; barrier(); l = last.low; barrier(); } while (last.high != h); This works because we expect last to be always increasing, so the only worry is low wrapping and incrementing high, and is more efficient than making the read fully atomic (the write is still cmpxchg64). But it's pretty ugly to open code just for 32b architectures; its something that might be useful to turn into a general abstraction (monotonic_read_64 FTW!). I already have code like this in the Xen time code, so I could make immediate use of it. J