public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:06:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCEB1EE.9050002@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BCE403E.7050605@redhat.com>

On 04/21/2010 03:01 AM, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>>> on this machine Glauber mentioned, or even on a multi-core Core 2 Duo),
>>> but the delta calculation is very hard (if not impossible) to get 
>>> right.
>>>
>>> The timewarps i've seen were in the 0-200ns range, and very rare (once
>>> every 10 minutes or so).
>>
>> Might be due to NMIs or SMIs interrupting the rdtsc(); ktime_get() 
>> operation which establishes the timeline.  We could limit it by 
>> having a loop doing rdtsc(); ktime_get(); rdtsc(); and checking for 
>> some bound, but it isn't worthwhile (and will break nested 
>> virtualization for sure).  Better to have the option to calibrate 
>> kvmclock just once on machines with 
>> X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TRULY_RELIABLE _TSC_HONESTLY.
> Yes. So its not as if the guest visible TSCs go out of sync (they don't
>
> There's a perfect way to do this and it still fails to stop 
> timewarps.  You can set the performance counters to overflow if more 
> instructions are issued than your code path, run an assembly 
> instruction stream and if the performance interrupt hits, restart the 
> calibration.

It's completely impractical.   The PMU is a global resource that is 
already shared among users and the host; programming and restoring it is 
expensive; and in a virtualized environment it the whole scheme may fail.

>
> The calibration happens not just once, but on every migration, and 
> currently, I believe, on every VCPU switch.  Even if we reduce the 
> number of calibrations to the bare minimum and rule out SMIs and NMIs, 
> there will still be variation due to factors beyond our control 
> because of the unpredictable nature of cache and instruction issue.

Right.

>
> However, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TRULY_RELIABLE_TSC_HONESTLY does imply 
> one key feature which the code is missing today:  on SMP VMs, the 
> calibration of kvmclock needs to be done only once, and the clock can 
> then be used for all VCPUs.  That, I think, stops Glauber's bug from 
> appearing on the server side.

That's the plan.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-15 18:37 [PATCH 0/5] pv clock misc fixes Glauber Costa
2010-04-15 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock Glauber Costa
2010-04-15 18:37   ` [PATCH 2/5] change msr numbers for kvmclock Glauber Costa
2010-04-15 18:37     ` [PATCH 3/5] Try using new kvm clock msrs Glauber Costa
2010-04-15 18:37       ` [PATCH 4/5] export new cpuid KVM_CAP Glauber Costa
2010-04-15 18:37         ` [PATCH 5/5] add documentation about kvmclock Glauber Costa
2010-04-15 19:28           ` Randy Dunlap
2010-04-15 20:10             ` Glauber Costa
2010-04-17 18:58         ` [PATCH 4/5] export new cpuid KVM_CAP Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 14:50           ` Glauber Costa
2010-04-20  9:29             ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-17 18:55       ` [PATCH 3/5] Try using new kvm clock msrs Avi Kivity
2010-04-17 18:51     ` [PATCH 2/5] change msr numbers for kvmclock Avi Kivity
2010-04-16 20:23   ` [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock Marcelo Tosatti
2010-04-16 20:36   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-16 21:05     ` Zachary Amsden
2010-04-19 10:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 10:50       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 11:05         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 11:10           ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 14:21             ` Glauber Costa
2010-04-19 14:33               ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 14:46                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 16:18                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-20  9:31                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-20 18:23                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-20 18:54                         ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-20 19:42                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-21  0:07                             ` Zachary Amsden
2010-04-22 13:11                             ` Glauber Costa
2010-04-23  1:44                               ` Zachary Amsden
2010-04-23  9:34                                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-23 19:22                                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-23 19:25                                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-23 21:31                                   ` Zachary Amsden
2010-04-23 21:35                                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-23 21:41                                       ` Zachary Amsden
2010-04-24  9:30                                         ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-24  9:29                                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 16:11                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-19 14:26     ` Glauber Costa
2010-04-19 16:19       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-19 18:25         ` Glauber Costa
2010-04-20  1:57           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-04-20  9:35             ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-20 12:59               ` Glauber Costa
2010-04-20 15:16                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-21  0:01               ` Zachary Amsden
2010-04-21  8:06                 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-04-17 18:48   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-17 18:49     ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 10:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 10:47         ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 10:56           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 11:13             ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 11:19               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 11:40                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 14:32                 ` Glauber Costa
2010-04-19 14:37                   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 10:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 10:49       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 10:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 10:54           ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 18:35             ` Zachary Amsden
2010-04-20  9:39               ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-21  0:05                 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-04-21  8:08                   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 10:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 10:53         ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 10:59           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 11:35             ` Avi Kivity
2010-10-25 23:30   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-26  8:14     ` Avi Kivity
2010-10-26 10:49       ` Glauber Costa
2010-10-26 17:04       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BCEB1EE.9050002@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox