public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] KVM: introduce a set_bit function for bitmaps in user space
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:09:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCEB2D5.6090201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BCE8587.7080607@oss.ntt.co.jp>

On 04/21/2010 07:56 AM, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> On 04/12/2010 02:08 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>    
>>> +#define __set_bit_user_asm(nr, addr, err, errret)            \
>>> +    asm volatile("1:    bts %1,%2\n"                \
>>> +             "2:\n"                        \
>>> +             ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"                \
>>> +             "3:    mov %3,%0\n"                \
>>> +             "    jmp 2b\n"                    \
>>> +             ".previous\n"                    \
>>> +             _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b)                \
>>> +             : "=r"(err)                    \
>>> +             : "r" (nr), "m" (__m(addr)), "i" (errret), "0" (err))
>>> +
>>> +#define set_bit_user(nr, addr)                        \
>>> +({                                    \
>>> +    int __ret_sbu = 0;                        \
>>> +                                    \
>>> +    might_fault();                            \
>>> +    if (access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, nr/8 + 1))            \
>>> +        __set_bit_user_asm(nr, addr, __ret_sbu, -EFAULT);    \
>>> +    else                                \
>>> +        __ret_sbu = -EFAULT;                    \
>>> +                                    \
>>> +    __ret_sbu;                            \
>>> +})
>>> +
>>>
>>>        
>> Should be called __set_bit_user() since it is non-atomic.
>>
>> An interesting wart is that this will use the kernel's word size instead
>> of userspace word size for access.  So, a 32-bit process might allocate
>> a 4-byte bitmap, and a 64-bit kernel will use a 64-bit access to touch
>> it, which might result in a fault.  This might be resolved by
>> documenting that userspace bitmaps must be a multiple of 64-bits in size
>> and recommending that they be 64-bit aligned as well.
>>      
> Yes, the inline assembler above generates a REX prefixed bts with the W field
> set (48 0f ab), which means we have a 64 bit operand size. In addition to the
> solution you propose we could also implement a legacy mode version that uses
> a 32bit bts. Compat ioctls and that ilk could pontentially benefit from this.
>    

We generally try to avoid compat ioctls; declaring that the bitmap is 
little endian and uses 64-bit words works around all of the difficulties.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-09  9:27 [PATCH RFC 0/5] KVM: Moving dirty bitmaps to userspace: double buffering approach Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-09  9:30 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] KVM: introduce a set_bit function for bitmaps in user space Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-11 17:08   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12  1:29     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-12  9:12       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-21  4:56     ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2010-04-21  8:09       ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-04-09  9:32 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] KVM: use a rapper function to calculate the sizes of dirty bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-11 17:12   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12  1:53     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-09  9:34 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] KVM: Use rapper functions to create and destroy " Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-11 17:13   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12  2:07     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-12  9:13       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-09  9:35 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] KVM: add new members to the memory slot for double buffering of bitmaps Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-11 17:15   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12  2:15     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-12  9:19       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12  9:30         ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-09  9:38 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] KVM: This is the main part of the "moving dirty bitmaps to user space" Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-11 17:21   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12  2:29     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-12  9:22       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12 20:55         ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2010-04-12 21:00           ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BCEB2D5.6090201@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox