From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: do not need hardware_disable when CPU_UP_CANCELED
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:41:37 +0300
Message-ID: <4BCEBA41.9050705@redhat.com>
References: <4BC978A3.8010502@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57107 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753019Ab0DUIlm (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:41:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4BC978A3.8010502@cn.fujitsu.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 04/17/2010 12:00 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> When CPU_UP_CANCELED, hardware_enable() has not been called at the CPU
> which is going up because raw_notifier_call_chain(CPU_ONLINE)
> has not been called for this cpu.
>    

Applied, thanks.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function