From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yoshiaki Tamura Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] kvm: port qemu-kvm's bitmap scanning Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:09:07 +0900 Message-ID: <4BD76E93.5010005@lab.ntt.co.jp> References: <20100427144244.GB23249@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: Received: from tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.147]:37754 "EHLO tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752923Ab0D0XJh (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:09:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100427144244.GB23249@amt.cnet> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:49:15PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch may conflict with the patch I posted on April 19. >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg29941.html >> >> If Marcelo's is going to be merged, I need to rebase the above to it. >> It would be helpful if you could tell me the plan. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Yoshi > > Yoshi, > > Whatever gets in first, the other patch will have to rebased. I'm > fine either way. I'm happy to rebase too. Wanted to know if there is a plan, so that I can work beforehand, but never mind.