public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: avoid unnecessary bitmap allocation when memslot is clean
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 12:36:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BDFEAB6.3090602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100428185036.5beb8a9e.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>

On 04/28/2010 12:50 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> Hi Marcelo, Avi,
>
> I updated the patch as follows.
>
> Changelog:
>   1. Inserted one "r = -ENOMEM;" line following Avi's advice.
>   2. Little change of explanation about performance improvements.
>
> I'm now testing and cleaning up my next patch series based on this,
> so please apply this if this makes sense and has no problems.
>
> Thanks,
>    Takuya
>
> ===
>
> Although we always allocate a new dirty bitmap in x86's get_dirty_log(),
> it is only used as a zero-source of copy_to_user() and freed right after
> that when memslot is clean. This patch uses clear_user() instead of doing
> this unnecessary zero-source allocation.
>
> Performance improvement: as we can expect easily, the time needed to
> allocate a bitmap is completely reduced. In my test, the improved ioctl
> was about 4 to 10 times faster than the original one for clean slots.
> Furthermore, reducing memory allocations and copies will produce good
> effects to caches too.
>
>    

Applied, thanks.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


      reply	other threads:[~2010-05-04  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-26  9:56 [PATCH 0/1] KVM: x86: avoid unnecessary bitmap allocation when memslot is clean Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-26  9:58 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-27 12:36   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-04-27 13:18   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 13:46     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-28  4:17       ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-04-28 10:27         ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-28 10:26       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-28  9:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-05-04  9:36   ` Avi Kivity [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BDFEAB6.3090602@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox