Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: eliminate TS_XSAVE

Avi Kivity
2010-05-04T07:41:19Z

On 05/04/2010 12:45 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> I was trying to avoid a performance regression relative to the current
>> code, as it appears that some care was taken to avoid the memory reference.
>>
>> I agree that it's probably negligible compared to the save/restore
>> code. If the x86 maintainers agree as well, I'll replace it with
>> cpu_has_xsave.
>>
>>
> I asked Suresh to comment on this, since he wrote the original code. He
> did confirm that the intent was to avoid a global memory reference.
>
>

Ok, so you're happy with the patch as is?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function